Demonstration · not a client result
Publication support what the deliverable looks like
The structure of the deliverable for publication support, how it is produced and how you accept it, with a live specimen generated from the matching free tool’s worked example. Synthetic or permitted data only.
What this page isDemonstration
- Practice
- 11 Research supervision, academic coaching & publication support
- The deliverable
- 4 sectionsProduced in 5 stages, each with a review point
- Data
- Synthetic or permittedNot a client result
Demonstration of methodSynthetic or permitted data.Not a client result.
The deliverable, section by section.
What you receive, and what each part is for.
Article plan
Which findings, which argument and which structure.
DemonstrationJournal shortlist
Fit, scope, indexing and open-access terms checked.
DemonstrationDraft feedback
Comments on your manuscript.
DemonstrationReview response plan
How to answer each reviewer point.
DemonstrationA live specimen.
Generated from the worked example in Journal finder: synthetic data, real method. Change the inputs in the tool to see your own.
Demonstration · synthetic data · not a client result
| Journal | Scope fit | Fee | Weeks | Risk | Warning signs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal A (example) | 4/4 | None | 12 | Low | None |
| Journal B (example) | 3/4 | USD 1,200 | 8 | Low | None |
| Journal C (example) | 4/4 | USD 450 | 2 | High | indexing not verified; peer review not described; editors not verifiable; unsolicited invitation; very fast decision promised |
Screen
- Gap: Journal C (example): several warning signs.indexing not verified; peer review not described; editors not verifiable; unsolicited invitation; very fast decision promised. Avoid until each is resolved at the source.
- Note: Dated screen, no guarantee.Screened on 9 October 2026. Journals change; re-check before submitting. Nothing here promises acceptance.
Submission checklist
Before you submit
- Read the aims and scope, and three recent articles.
- Confirm indexing in the index itself, not on the journal’s site.
- Check the fee, waivers and licence terms.
- Follow the author guidelines exactly: length, format, references.
- Agree authorship and order with every co-author in writing.
How it is produced, and accepted.
Each stage ends in something you review; acceptance is tested against criteria agreed at the start.
- 01
Question
Identify the article’s question within your thesis.
Review pointThe research question is the researcher’s own, stated in writing.
- 02
Design
Plan the structure and the target journal.
Review pointDesign choices explained, and decided by the researcher.
- 03
Researcher-led work
You write the manuscript.
Review pointAll writing and analysis done by the researcher.
- 04
Feedback
We give feedback; you revise.
Review pointFeedback given as comments and questions, never replacement text.
- 05
Declared assistance
Acknowledge the assistance as the journal requires.
Review pointAssistance declared in line with the institution’s rules.
How proof is labelled
- DemonstrationsDemonstrations use synthetic or permitted data.
- Documented experienceDocumented experience is attributed to the organisation that held the work.
- Measured resultsMeasured results are added only once they have been measured; none are shown yet.
What needs to move forward?
Tell us the decision, the challenge or the opportunity. We reply with a scoped approach, a named principal and a fee before any work begins.
No charge to submit an enquiry.