Demonstration · not a client result
Accessibility audit and remediation what the deliverable looks like
The structure of the deliverable for accessibility audit and remediation, how it is produced and how you accept it, with a live specimen generated from the matching free tool’s worked example. Synthetic or permitted data only.
What this page isDemonstration
- Practice
- 05 Digital solutions
- The deliverable
- 4 sectionsProduced in 5 stages, each with a review point
- Data
- Synthetic or permittedNot a client result
Demonstration of methodSynthetic or permitted data.Not a client result.
The deliverable, section by section.
What you receive, and what each part is for.
Audit report
Issues by criterion, severity and location.
DemonstrationRemediation
Fixes to the defined pages or templates.
DemonstrationTest record
Keyboard, screen-reader and contrast checks performed.
DemonstrationGuidance
How to keep new content accessible.
DemonstrationA live specimen.
Generated from the worked example in Colour contrast checker: synthetic data, real method. Change the inputs in the tool to see your own.
Demonstration · synthetic data · not a client result
- Body text#111112 on #FBFAF718.08:1AA passAAA pass
- Links#14418F on #FBFAF79.22:1AA passAAA pass
- Caption text#8A8A8A on #FFFFFF3.45:1AA failAAA fail
- Button border#D2D0C7 on #FFFFFF1.55:1AA failAAA fail
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Every control can be reached and used with the keyboard alone | Pass |
| Keyboard focus is always visible | Pass |
| Headings, labels and link text make sense to a screen reader | Pass |
| Informative images have text alternatives; decorative ones are hidden | Not tested |
| Content works at 200% zoom and on a 320-pixel-wide screen | Fail |
| Motion can be paused and respects the reduced-motion setting | Not tested |
| Form errors are described in text, next to the field | Not tested |
| Video has captions; audio has a transcript | Not tested |
Findings
- Gap: “Caption text” fails: 3.45:1.Needs at least 4.5:1. Darken the text or lighten the background.
- Gap: “Button border” fails: 1.55:1.Interface parts need at least 3:1 against adjacent colours.
- Gap: Manual test failed: content works at 200% zoom and on a 320-pixel-wide screen.
- Check: 4 manual tests have not been done.Untested is not the same as passing.
- Note: This is not a full accessibility audit.Contrast and a short checklist cover part of WCAG 2.2. A conformance claim needs a full audit of every page and state in scope.
How it is produced, and accepted.
Each stage ends in something you review; acceptance is tested against criteria agreed at the start.
- 01
User need
Agree the pages, templates and target standard.
Review pointUser needs and success measures agreed.
- 02
Scope
Fix the sample and the test plan.
Review pointWritten scope with acceptance criteria.
- 03
Build
Audit and remediate.
Review pointWorking build demonstrated at agreed milestones.
- 04
Test
Retest manually and with tools.
Review pointAcceptance tests passed and recorded.
- 05
Handover
Hand over the report and guidance.
Review pointHandover of code, content, access and documentation.
How proof is labelled
- DemonstrationsDemonstrations use synthetic or permitted data.
- Documented experienceDocumented experience is attributed to the organisation that held the work.
- Measured resultsMeasured results are added only once they have been measured; none are shown yet.
What needs to move forward?
Tell us the decision, the challenge or the opportunity. We reply with a scoped approach, a named principal and a fee before any work begins.
No charge to submit an enquiry.