
Accessibility audit and remediation WCAG 2.2 and Section 508
We audit and remediate a defined set of pages or templates against WCAG 2.2, including manual keyboard and assistive-technology checks, and hand over a record of what was fixed and how it was tested.
Tell us what you need- Led by
- Michael Gagakuma and Kenneth Gagakuma
- Delivery
- Remote, and on site from Accra
- Fees
- Fixed fee, quoted to your scope
- Contracting
- GKM Legacy Holdings, Maryland
- Practice
- 05 of 11: Digital solutions
What you receive.
Documents you can use, each with its method and sources attached.
04in the pack
See a demonstration of the output: Specimen · Accessibility audit & remediation (WCAG 2.2 / Section 508)
Audit report
Issues by criterion, severity and location.
Remediation
Fixes to the defined pages or templates.
Test record
Keyboard, screen-reader and contrast checks performed.
Guidance
How to keep new content accessible.
Who commissions this, and when.
Buyers and moments where this work pays for itself, and where it does not.
Who it is for
- EU institutions and e-commerce firms
- US public-sector contractors under Section 508
- Universities and colleges
- NGOs publishing to the public
When to call us
- A procurement requires accessibility conformance
- Users report barriers
- A redesign needs accessibility built in
When it is not the answer
Automated scans find only some issues. Manual testing is part of every audit; conformance claims are made only for what was tested.
Led byMichael Gagakuma and Kenneth Gagakuma
- Practice
- 05 · Digital solutions
- Contracting
- GKM Legacy Holdings, Maryland
- Consultation
- from USD 90
Scope and fees.
Fees are agreed in writing before work begins. Estimates are shown as estimates.
Fees
Fixed fee, quoted to your scope
Send a brief or book a short call. We reply with a written scope, dates and a fixed fee before any work begins.
What we need from you
- Access to the site or templates
- A test environment
- Your target standard
Not included unless agreed
- Pages outside the defined set
- Third-party components you do not control
- Legal conformance statements beyond the tested scope
How the work runs.
Each stage ends in something you review before the next begins.
Stage 1 of 5
User need
Agree the pages, templates and target standard.
Review pointUser needs and success measures agreed.
Stage 2 of 5
Scope
Fix the sample and the test plan.
Review pointWritten scope with acceptance criteria.
Stage 3 of 5
Build
Audit and remediate.
Review pointWorking build demonstrated at agreed milestones.
Stage 4 of 5
Test
Retest manually and with tools.
Review pointAcceptance tests passed and recorded.
Stage 5 of 5
Handover
Hand over the report and guidance.
Review pointHandover of code, content, access and documentation.
Questions buyers ask.
Anything else: ask in a brief.
Do you test with screen readers?
Yes, with keyboard and screen-reader checks recorded.
Can you fix third-party widgets?
Only where we can change them; otherwise we document the issue.
Is there a free check?
Yes: the accessibility checklist and contrast workbench.
Related work
What needs to move forward?
Tell us the decision, the challenge or the opportunity. We reply with a scoped approach, a named principal and a fee before any work begins.
No charge to submit an enquiry.
