Demonstration · not a client result
Institutional research capacity what the deliverable looks like
The structure of the deliverable for institutional research capacity, how it is produced and how you accept it, with a live specimen generated from the matching free tool’s worked example. Synthetic or permitted data only.
What this page isDemonstration
- Practice
- 11 Research supervision, academic coaching & publication support
- The deliverable
- 4 sectionsProduced in 5 stages, each with a review point
- Data
- Synthetic or permittedNot a client result
Demonstration of methodSynthetic or permitted data.Not a client result.
The deliverable, section by section.
What you receive, and what each part is for.
Capacity diagnostic
Supervision, examining, office and publication gaps.
DemonstrationCapacity plan
What to build, borrow or buy, and when.
DemonstrationExternal support
Supervisors or examiners, where agreed.
DemonstrationPublication strategy
Targets, journals and integrity safeguards.
DemonstrationA live specimen.
Generated from the worked example in University research capacity assessment: synthetic data, real method. Change the inputs in the tool to see your own.
Demonstration · synthetic data · not a client result
35/100
Research capacity
Foundational: Build the basics: ethics, integrity policies and supervision capacity.
- Supervision25%
- Research ethics63%
- Research office25%
- Outputs and publication25%
- Integrity and authorship38%
Critical gaps
- Gap: We have enough qualified supervisors for our doctoral candidates.Map candidates per supervisor by field; recruit or share external supervisors where overloaded.
Gap register: first actions
- 01Create an institutional repository and record outputs.Outputs and publication · scored 0 of 4Research outputs are recorded in a repository.
- 02Map candidates per supervisor by field; recruit or share external supervisors where overloaded.Supervision · scored 1 of 4We have enough qualified supervisors for our doctoral candidates.
- 03Introduce a supervisor development programme.Supervision · scored 1 of 4New supervisors receive structured preparation.
- 04Set up or resource a research office with pre-award support.Research office · scored 1 of 4A research office supports funding bids and contracts.
- 05Adopt a research data management policy and storage.Research office · scored 1 of 4Research data are stored securely and managed.
Self-assessment against a published rubric. No ranking or accreditation outcome is implied.
How it is produced, and accepted.
Each stage ends in something you review; acceptance is tested against criteria agreed at the start.
- 01
Question
Define what the institution needs to achieve.
Review pointThe research question is the researcher’s own, stated in writing.
- 02
Design
Design the capacity plan.
Review pointDesign choices explained, and decided by the researcher.
- 03
Researcher-led work
Staff and researchers lead their own work.
Review pointAll writing and analysis done by the researcher.
- 04
Feedback
Review progress and give feedback.
Review pointFeedback given as comments and questions, never replacement text.
- 05
Declared assistance
Record external assistance transparently.
Review pointAssistance declared in line with the institution’s rules.
How proof is labelled
- DemonstrationsDemonstrations use synthetic or permitted data.
- Documented experienceDocumented experience is attributed to the organisation that held the work.
- Measured resultsMeasured results are added only once they have been measured; none are shown yet.
What needs to move forward?
Tell us the decision, the challenge or the opportunity. We reply with a scoped approach, a named principal and a fee before any work begins.
No charge to submit an enquiry.