A GKM Legacy Holdings company · contracting in Maryland, USA · delivering from Accra, Ghana
Strategic Advisory
& AI
Book a consultation

Demonstration · not a client result

Academic and professional-body partnerships what the deliverable looks like

The structure of the deliverable for academic and professional-body partnerships, how it is produced and how you accept it, with a live specimen generated from the matching free tool’s worked example. Synthetic or permitted data only.

DemonstrationSynthetic or permitted data

What this page isDemonstration

Practice
10 Executive advisory
The deliverable
4 sectionsProduced in 5 stages, each with a review point
Data
Synthetic or permittedNot a client result

Demonstration of methodSynthetic or permitted data.Not a client result.

The deliverable, section by section.

What you receive, and what each part is for.

Section 01 of 04

Needs note

What your programme requires, and why.

Demonstration
Section 02 of 04

Contribution proposal

Modules, sessions or roles we can take on.

Demonstration
Section 03 of 04

Delivery plan

Dates, formats and quality arrangements.

Demonstration
Section 04 of 04

Review

Feedback and renewal at the end of the cycle.

Demonstration

A live specimen.

Generated from the worked example in Learning outcomes and assessment mapper: synthetic data, real method. Change the inputs in the tool to see your own.

Demonstration · synthetic data · not a client result

4outcomes
50%aligned
100%assessment weight
Outcome-to-assessment map
#OutcomeLevelTaskWeightStatus
01Apply published evaluation criteria to score three bidsApplyScore three sample bids40%Aligned
02Explain the stages of the procurement cycleUnderstandShort quiz20%Aligned
03Evaluate a contract award decision for compliance risksEvaluateMultiple-choice quiz20%Task too low
04Understand the importance of ethics in procurementUnderstandNone20%No task, Vague verb

Alignment issues

  • Check: Outcome 3 asks learners to evaluate, but a quiz or multiple choice tests at a lower level.Use a case, practical task or project that makes learners do it.
  • Gap: Outcome 4 is not assessed.Each assessed outcome needs a task that shows it.
  • Check: Outcome 4 uses “understand”, which cannot be observed.Use a verb you can see: explain, calculate, compare, design, decide.
Weight by level of thinking
  1. Understand40%
  2. Apply40%
  3. Evaluate20%

How it is produced, and accepted.

Each stage ends in something you review; acceptance is tested against criteria agreed at the start.

  1. 01

    Question

    Understand the programme and its needs.

    Review pointThe question is written down before the session.

  2. 02

    Expert match

    Match principals to the contribution.

    Review pointThe principal is matched to the question.

  3. 03

    Preparation

    Prepare the proposal with your faculty.

    Review pointPreparation is read and noted in advance.

  4. 04

    Conversation

    Discuss and agree with the programme lead.

    Review pointThe conversation stays on the decision.

  5. 05

    Next action

    Deliver and review.

    Review pointA short written note records the next action.

How proof is labelled

  • DemonstrationsDemonstrations use synthetic or permitted data.
  • Documented experienceDocumented experience is attributed to the organisation that held the work.
  • Measured resultsMeasured results are added only once they have been measured; none are shown yet.

What needs to move forward?

Tell us the decision, the challenge or the opportunity. We reply with a scoped approach, a named principal and a fee before any work begins.

No charge to submit an enquiry.