A GKM Legacy Holdings company · contracting in Maryland, USA · delivering from Accra, Ghana
Strategic Advisory
& AI
Book a consultation

Demonstration · not a client result

Grant proposal writing for donors what the deliverable looks like

The structure of the deliverable for grant proposal writing for donors, how it is produced and how you accept it, with a live specimen generated from the matching free tool’s worked example. Synthetic or permitted data only.

DemonstrationSynthetic or permitted data

What this page isDemonstration

Practice
06 Bids, proposals & intelligence
The deliverable
4 sectionsProduced in 5 stages, each with a review point
Data
Synthetic or permittedNot a client result

Demonstration of methodSynthetic or permitted data.Not a client result.

The deliverable, section by section.

What you receive, and what each part is for.

Section 01 of 04

Fit review

How the concept matches the call, with the gaps.

Demonstration
Section 02 of 04

Narrative

Problem, approach, results and sustainability, drafted with you.

Demonstration
Section 03 of 04

Logframe

Results chain, indicators, targets and assumptions.

Demonstration
Section 04 of 04

Budget workstream

Budget structure and notes aligned to the narrative; the figures remain yours.

Demonstration

A live specimen.

Generated from the worked example in Theory of change template: synthetic data, real method. Change the inputs in the tool to see your own.

Demonstration · synthetic data · not a client result

2outcomes
3outputs
3activities
6logic gaps
Logframe
LevelResultIndicatorAssumption or link
GoalMore young people in the target districts earn a decent living.––
Outcome 1Graduates find and keep paid work or self-employment% of graduates in work six months after completionLocal employers keep hiring at current levels
Outcome 2Train 1,200 young people in market skillsNumber trainedMissing
Output 1Courses delivered with employer-designed contentCourses delivered to standardOutcome 1
Output 2Graduates placed in internshipsInternship placementsOutcome 1
Output 3Mentoring network for young entrepreneursMissingOutcome 3
Activity 1Co-design curricula with employers–Output 1
Activity 2Recruit and train instructors–Output 1
Activity 3Negotiate internship agreements–Output 2

Logic check

  • Check: Outcome 2 reads like an activity: “Train 1,200 young people in market skills”.An outcome is a change in people or institutions, not something the programme does.
  • Gap: Nothing produces outcome 2.Link at least one output to it, or remove it.
  • Check: Outcome 2 has no assumption.What must hold true outside your control for it to happen?
  • Gap: Output 3 is linked to outcome 3, which does not exist.
  • Check: No activity delivers output 3.
  • Check: Output 3 has no indicator.

Theory of change, in sentences

Pathway to outcome 1

If we co-design curricula with employers; recruit and train instructors; negotiate internship agreements, we will deliver courses delivered with employer-designed content; graduates placed in internships. If that happens, and local employers keep hiring at current levels, then graduates find and keep paid work or self-employment, contributing to the goal: more young people in the target districts earn a decent living.

Pathway to outcome 2

If we [activities missing], we will deliver [outputs missing]. If that happens, then train 1,200 young people in market skills, contributing to the goal: more young people in the target districts earn a decent living.

How it is produced, and accepted.

Each stage ends in something you review; acceptance is tested against criteria agreed at the start.

  1. 01

    Opportunity

    Read the call and confirm the fit.

    Review pointOpportunity confirmed live, with the deadline and documents.

  2. 02

    Eligibility

    Check eligibility, co-financing and partner requirements.

    Review pointEligibility tested against your registration, track record and partners.

  3. 03

    Evidence

    Gather the evidence for need, capacity and results.

    Review pointEvery claim in the response traceable to a document you hold.

  4. 04

    Response

    Draft the narrative, logframe and budget notes.

    Review pointResponse reviewed against the compliance matrix before sign-off.

  5. 05

    Submission

    Review against the call’s criteria and support submission.

    Review pointSubmission route, format and deadline confirmed in writing.

How proof is labelled

  • DemonstrationsDemonstrations use synthetic or permitted data.
  • Documented experienceDocumented experience is attributed to the organisation that held the work.
  • Measured resultsMeasured results are added only once they have been measured; none are shown yet.

What needs to move forward?

Tell us the decision, the challenge or the opportunity. We reply with a scoped approach, a named principal and a fee before any work begins.

No charge to submit an enquiry.