A GKM Legacy Holdings company · contracting in Maryland, USA · delivering from Accra, Ghana
Strategic Advisory
& AI
Book a consultation

Demonstration · not a client result

Training-needs assessment and skills audits what the deliverable looks like

The structure of the deliverable for training-needs assessment and skills audits, how it is produced and how you accept it, with a live specimen generated from the matching free tool’s worked example. Synthetic or permitted data only.

DemonstrationSynthetic or permitted data

What this page isDemonstration

Practice
02 Management & institutional strengthening
The deliverable
6 sectionsProduced in 5 stages, each with a review point
Data
Synthetic or permittedNot a client result

Demonstration of methodSynthetic or permitted data.Not a client result.

The deliverable, section by section.

What you receive, and what each part is for.

Section 01 of 06

Competency map

By role family, built on your organogram and job descriptions.

Demonstration
Section 02 of 06

Skills-gap matrix

Required against current, weighted by importance and headcount.

Demonstration
Section 03 of 06

Skills-gap report

Findings with an evidence trail back to every survey item and interview.

Demonstration
Section 04 of 06

Costed training plan

Formats, sequence and cost estimates, prioritised by the gap scores, with assumptions stated.

Demonstration
Section 05 of 06

Curriculum outline

For the top priorities, ready for a provider or your own trainers.

Demonstration
Section 06 of 06

Validation workshop

With your leadership, before anything is final.

Demonstration

A live specimen.

Generated from the worked example in Training needs assessment: synthetic data, real method. Change the inputs in the tool to see your own.

Demonstration · synthetic data · not a client result

34%weighted capability gap
10/15role–skill pairs below requirement
9people in scope
Gap by role and competency (required minus today, 0 to 4)
RowResults-based budgetingSpreadsheet data analysisPublic procurement rulesReport writing for decision-makersStakeholder engagement
Budget officer4 people22→412→302→212→302→2
Planning officer3 people12→321→301→112→312→3
Procurement officer2 people11→202→222→402→211→2

Draft training priorities

  1. 01
    Results-based budgeting9 people · largest gap 2 · critical · priority score 39Structured workshop with a practice assignment, 2 to 3 days, then follow-up. Roles: Budget officer, Planning officer, Procurement officer.
  2. 02
    Spreadsheet data analysis7 people · largest gap 2 · important · priority score 20Structured workshop with a practice assignment, 2 to 3 days, then follow-up. Roles: Budget officer, Planning officer.
  3. 03
    Report writing for decision-makers7 people · largest gap 1 · important · priority score 14Coaching and on-the-job guidance, Half a day, then support in role. Roles: Budget officer, Planning officer.
  4. 04
    Public procurement rules2 people · largest gap 2 · critical · priority score 12Structured workshop with a practice assignment, 2 to 3 days, then follow-up. Roles: Procurement officer.
  5. 05
    Stakeholder engagement5 people · largest gap 1 · useful · priority score 5Coaching and on-the-job guidance, Half a day, then support in role. Roles: Planning officer, Procurement officer.

Before you plan spending

  • Check: Today’s levels here are self-reported or estimated.Validate the largest gaps with observation, work samples or short tests before committing budget.
  • Note: Use it for development planning only.A skills-gap score must never decide hiring, promotion or dismissal on its own.

How it is produced, and accepted.

Each stage ends in something you review; acceptance is tested against criteria agreed at the start.

  1. 01

    Mandate

    Agree the decision the assessment must inform, the roles in scope and the timeline.

    Review pointSigned scope note: the decision, the units in scope and the timeline.

  2. 02

    Diagnostic

    Survey instrument, interviews, document review, self and manager ratings.

    Review pointDiagnostic instruments signed off.

  3. 03

    Options

    Gap matrix, priority scoring and training options with formats, sequence and costs.

    Review pointOptions paper reviewed with leadership.

  4. 04

    Validation

    Leadership validation workshop on the findings and the plan.

    Review pointValidation workshop held and comments recorded.

  5. 05

    Implementation

    Final report, data files and plan, handed over with the method.

    Review pointWritten acceptance and a handover of files and method.

Documented experience.

Attributed roles behind this work, each with its source.

The Professor’s PRIN tenureDevelopment Bank of Ethiopia: competency mappingThe Professor served as principal consultant, through PRIN International, on competency mapping for the Development Bank of Ethiopia. The letter attributes training and development needs definition for more than 500 positions.
2018PwC Ghana for COTVET: national skills audit in seven sectorsThe Professor served as Subject Matter Expert on PwC’s team: baseline research, the survey instrument, data validation and analysis, sector reports and stakeholder engagement.
Feasibility report completed December 2024Aveyime Water Supply Project: institutional and skills analysisThe Professor contributed skills development and institutional analysis, through Colan Consult, to the project’s feasibility report.

Individual experience of our principals, before or outside GKM Strategic Advisory & AI. Not GKM contracts.

How proof is labelled

  • DemonstrationsDemonstrations use synthetic or permitted data.
  • Documented experienceDocumented experience is attributed to the organisation that held the work.
  • Measured resultsMeasured results are added only once they have been measured; none are shown yet.

What needs to move forward?

Tell us the decision, the challenge or the opportunity. We reply with a scoped approach, a named principal and a fee before any work begins.

No charge to submit an enquiry.