
EU AI Act Article 50 checklist
AI content disclosure
See which Article 50 points may apply to you.
Try the checklistThe film is unavailable. You can read what it shows below.
What the film shows, in words
- See which Article 50 points may apply to you.
- You deploy a chatbot that also generates images.
- 1 point may apply: Article 50(1), via your provider.
- If it also creates deepfakes: 2 points.
- If you also supply the system: 3 points.
- Dated the day you run it. For a qualified adviser to review.
The demo: the worked example, one change at a time
ExampleFor a qualified adviser to review. Not legal advice.
You deploy a chatbot that also generates images.
Worked example: an agency deploying a chatbot and generating images for EU clients.
As providerNot your plate
One mark here is read from the deployer’s side.
As deployerYour plate
- Article 50(1), via your providerConfirm with your provider how people are told they are interacting with AI, and keep that confirmation.Read through your own glass: the mark sits on the provider’s plate.
Role assessed: Deployer. 1 point may apply: “Article 50(1), via your provider”, read through the front plate. The rail, Article 50(5), is lit. “Generates images, audio, video or text” etches nothing for a deployer on this checklist: its seat is on the provider’s plate.
- point may apply
- 1
- role assessed
- Deployer
- checklist dated
- the day you run it
a point that may apply: a mark, never “met” a mark read through the other glass an empty seat your plate, lit at its foot
Now your own system, plate by plate.
Tell us your role and what your AI system produces or does. The checklist lists the Article 50 transparency points that may apply, with the paragraph each comes from, dated for review by a qualified adviser.
Common safeguards, item by item.
Twelve safeguards for any organisation that puts AI to work on real records, in any country. Each is our own proposed practice, and says so. Where a country’s law has been read, its module is added, each statement with its section. No EU rule is shown as another country’s duty.
The checklist, in full.
The worked example’s answers. Dated when you run it.
Article 50 transparency checklist
Article 50(1), via your provider
- Confirm with your provider how people are told they are interacting with AI, and keep that confirmation.
- Keep your own notice in place where you configure the conversation.
Article 50(5): how the information is given
- Give the information clearly and distinguishably, at the latest at the first interaction or exposure, and in an accessible way.
Before you rely on this
- Check: Dates and details can change.Article 50 applies from 2 August 2026. The Digital Omnibus on AI (Regulation (EU) 2026/1744) postponed the Article 50(2) marking duty to 2 December 2026. Check the current text and Commission guidance before publication.
An evidence checklist for review by a qualified adviser. It is not legal advice and gives no compliance badge.
GKM Strategic Advisory & AI
Dated AI content-disclosure checklist
Common safeguards checklist
Your organisation
- Dated
- when you run it
- Role
- Deployer
- Points that may apply
- 1
- Article 50(1), via your provider
- Article 50(5): how the information is given
An evidence checklist for review by a qualified adviser. It is not legal advice and gives no compliance badge.
- Dated
- when you run it
- Seen
- 0
- Reported
- 0
- Not in place
- 0
- Unknown
- 12
- A named owner for each AI useUnknown
- No personal or confidential data in unapproved toolsUnknown
- A person checks every output before it is acted onUnknown
- No decision about a person is left to the toolUnknown
- A record of what was generated, and by which toolUnknown
- AI-made content given to the public is labelledUnknown
- and 6 more, in full above
A working list of evidence, for your own review and for a qualified adviser. It is not legal advice. It gives no rating, mark or seal, and it does not say that any law is met.
Your dated checklist
Dated AI content-disclosure checklist, by email once delivery is connected.
Dated AI content-disclosure checklist (PDF), ready for expert review
Tool: Article 50 checklist Role: deployer Result: 1 point may apply Request: please review our Article 50 position (SVC-046).Send as a brief
How the plates are read, and their limits.
The mapping is published so you can check it. A mark means “may apply”. It never means “met”, and the page gives no badge.
Method
- 01
The questions map to Article 50(1) to 50(5) of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689: provider duties for interaction notices and machine-readable marking, deployer duties for emotion recognition, deepfakes and public-interest text.
- 02
The editorial-responsibility and artistic-work exceptions are applied only where you confirm them.
- 03
Every checklist is dated on the day you run it.
What it cannot tell you
- It covers Article 50 only, not the rest of the AI Act.
- Whether you are a provider or deployer can be a legal question; take advice when unsure.
- Check current law and guidance before relying on it.
Quality ruleCheck current primary law before publication; no blanket compliant badge.
Where each point sits
| What the system does | Seat | Plate | The tool’s heading |
|---|---|---|---|
| Talks or chats with people | 50(1) | As provider | Article 50(1): people must know they are interacting with AIFor the other role alone: “Article 50(1), via your provider”, read through its own glass. |
| Generates images, audio, video or text | 50(2) | As provider | Article 50(2): machine-readable marking of synthetic output |
| Creates realistic content showing real people, places or events | 50(4) | As deployer | Article 50(4): disclose deepfakes |
| Publishes AI text informing the public on matters of public interest | 50(4) | As deployer | Article 50(4): AI text on matters of public interest |
| Recognises emotions or categorises people by biometric data | 50(3) | As deployer | Article 50(3): inform people exposed to emotion recognition or biometric categorisation |
The rail both plates stand in is “Article 50(5): how the information is given”. The tool adds it whenever any point applies and does not count it. This table is the tool’s own mapping, shown as such: check current law and guidance before relying on it.
The other view: common safeguards.
A separate list, for any country. It is not part of the Article 50 mapping above, and nothing from that mapping is shown in it.
How the list is read
- 01
Twelve common safeguards, each our own proposed practice and labelled so. They are the same in every country.
- 02
A country module adds what that country’s law says, each statement with the section it was read from, the official address, the date it was read and who read it. Reviewed today: Ghana and Nigeria. Any other country gets the common safeguards, and the missing coverage is named.
- 03
You mark the evidence for each item: seen, reported, not in place or unknown. The result counts each, lists what is not in place and what is unknown, and says what to gather next. Nothing is added up into a rating.
What it cannot tell you
- The common safeguards are recommendations, not duties. Following all twelve does not show that any law is met.
- A country module states what the text says, with its section. It does not decide whether that law applies to you.
- The page sees no evidence. “Seen” is your own record.
- No EU rule is shown as another country’s duty. The EU AI Act’s transparency points are in the other view of this tool.
When a checklist is not enough.
Service · 04 AI governance & assuranceEU AI Act Article 50↗-
Michael GagakumaTool owner · consultations from USD 90Book Michael -
Kenneth GagakumaTool owner · consultations from USD 90Book Kenneth

