04 · AI governance & assurance
EU AI Act Article 50 transparency, applied to your systems
We check one AI system against the EU AI Act’s Article 50 transparency obligations, as a provider or a deployer, and help you put the applicable disclosure and marking controls in place.
Tell us what you need- Led by
- Michael Gagakuma and Kenneth Gagakuma
- Delivery
- Remote, and on site from Accra
- Fees
- Fixed fee, quoted to your scope
- Free tool
- AI content-disclosure checklist
- Contracting
- GKM Legacy Holdings, Maryland
What you receive.
Documents you can use, each with its method and sources attached.
04in the pack
See a demonstration of the output: Specimen · EU AI Act Article 50
System inventory
The AI systems and outputs in scope.
Applicability note
Which obligations apply to you as provider or deployer, and why.
Control set
Disclosure, labelling and marking controls, with examples.
Owner and review plan
Who runs each control and when it is checked.
Who commissions this, and when.
Buyers and moments where this work pays for itself, and where it does not.
Who it is for
- EU-facing marketing teams and agencies
- SaaS and e-commerce firms using generative AI
- Publishers and content studios
- Firms with chatbots facing EU users
When to call us
- You publish AI-generated or AI-edited content to EU audiences
- Customers interact with an AI system you provide or deploy
- A client or partner asks how you meet Article 50
When it is not the answer
We give an operational assessment, not a legal opinion. Where your position turns on legal interpretation, we frame the question for counsel.
Led byMichael Gagakuma and Kenneth Gagakuma
- Practice
- 04 · AI governance & assurance
- Contracting
- GKM Legacy Holdings, Maryland
- Consultation
- from USD 90
Scope and fees.
Fees are agreed in writing before work begins. Estimates are shown as estimates.
Fees
Fixed fee, quoted to your scope
Send a brief or book a short call. We reply with a written scope, dates and a fixed fee before any work begins.
What we need from you
- System description and outputs
- Where and how outputs are published
- Current disclosure practice
Not included unless agreed
- Legal opinions
- Technical watermarking builds unless scoped
- Other AI Act obligations, scoped separately
How the work runs.
Each stage ends in something you review before the next begins.
Stage 1 of 5
Inventory
List the system, its outputs and where they reach EU audiences.
Review pointInventory of systems and data in scope, confirmed by you.
Stage 2 of 5
Applicability
Determine your role and the obligations that apply.
Review pointApplicability findings reviewed before controls are drafted.
Stage 3 of 5
Controls
Design the disclosure and marking controls.
Review pointControls agreed with the people who will run them.
Stage 4 of 5
Ownership
Assign owners and train them.
Review pointOwners named and accepted in writing.
Stage 5 of 5
Review
Set the review cadence and evidence to keep.
Review pointReview date set, with what will be checked.
Questions buyers ask.
Anything else: ask in a brief.
Is this all of the AI Act?
No. It covers the transparency obligations in Article 50. Other obligations are scoped separately.
Do we need a lawyer too?
For contested interpretations, yes. We frame the questions so that advice is short and targeted.
Is there a free first step?
Yes: the AI content-disclosure checklist gives a dated first view for expert review.
What needs to move forward?
Tell us the decision, the challenge or the opportunity. We reply with a scoped approach, a named principal and a fee before any work begins.
No charge to submit an enquiry.